This opened him up to “charges of unethical conduct and to the suspicion he had become a merchant of false hope”, which led to several instances of media controversy. Already have an account? Burzynski’s treatment instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation – with full disclosure of their original medical records to support their full recovery from prior terminal cancer diagnoses. Clogged with court transcripts, medical records and repetitive if moving patient testimony, Burzynski tickles the mind only at the cost of trampling the eyes. He pointed out that there is little or no convincing clinical evidence that antineoplastons have activity against cancer, much less that they offer hope to a desperate patient like Billie. Recent criticism has focused on the use of crowdfunding to raise the costs of quack treatments, including specifically hundreds of thousands of dollars in the case of the Burzynski Clinic. Jun 4, Rating:

I found this rather curious, given that the pathology report was included in the other two cases presented. Post Share on Facebook. Five is right out. The Burzynski Clinic has also made use of compassionate use exemptions. Burzynski is the kind of should’ve-been-important picture that you damn with the faintest praise: He is not a bold visionary. As I stated, the first 30 minutes of the documentary played like an infomercial but it was very important information to relay to the audience. For the most part, these publications have been authored by the developer of the therapy, Dr.

In Decemberthe use of chemotherapeutic agents by the clinic has been characterized as “random” and their use of unapproved combinations “with no known benefits but clear harms” by the Texas Medical Boardwhich regulates and licenses physicians in the state of Texas, led to a case against Burzynski by that board.

Burzynski and his patients endured a treacherous year journey in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials for a new cancer-fighting drug. Over thirty are of unknown status, and only one is completed.

Burzynski Clinic

Since the mids, Burzynski registered some sixty clinical trials of antineoplastons and, in Decembera Phase III trial which did not open thf patient recruitment. Can he do what he claims for cancer? Second, a growth curve based on serial MRI tests is presented that is most curious. The first active peptide fraction identified was called antineoplaston A 3-phenylacetylamino-2,6-piperidinedione.

Again, there are no pathology reports of core needle biopsies of the suspected metastases. Publications have taken the form of case reports, phase I clinical trials, toxicity studies, and phase II clinical trials”, [20] and “for the most part, these publications have been authored by the stanislwa of the therapy, Dr.


However, appeals to the FDA compassionate use exemptions are not always successful. In early reports, he found that healthy people had more antineoplastons in their blood and urine than people with cancer results portrayed in cartoon form in the movie.

Don’t have an account? The movie is, however, still available at that other wretched hive of scum and quackery besides the Huffington Postnamely the video outlet for Mike Hurzynski, NaturalNews. Updated July 8, If only the spin on such stories was more like that of the story of Wayne Merritt!

Burzynski () – IMDb

Gorski’s stanislaaw information, disclaimers regarding his writings, and notice to patients here. This page was last edited on 15 Februaryat Archived from the original on April 1, I definitely won’t pay good money to see one in a theater. It turns out that the grenade is a dud.

Ina day trial resulted in the dismissal of the 34 counts of mail fraud. Sincethe clinic has marketed itself as offering “personalized gene-targeted cancer therapy”, which has stirred further controversy, as the treatment bears no relationship to gene-targeted therapy and only superficially incorporates elements of personalized medicine. Instead, Burzynski relies on testimonials for evidence, all the while charging patients like Billie Bainbridge huge amounts of money to take part in his clinical trials, a practice that, while not illegal — although it should be — is highly unethical and quite properly viewed with suspicion by legitimate cancer clinical trialists like myself.

She was operated on, and a mass was removed, as described on this pathology report. They concluded that the studies were poorly designed, not interpretable, and “so flawed that it cannot be determined whether it really works”.

What was initially curious to me about this particular testimonial is the question of why a surgeon would have operated if the baby already had liver and lung metastases at the time of diagnosis. David Gorski on November 28, Inthe FDA issued a warning letter to the Burzynski Research Institute, stating that an investigation had determined the Burzynski Institutional Review Board Stanilaw “did not adhere to the applicable statutory requirements and FDA regulations governing the protection of human subjects.

Burzynski Clinic – Wikipedia

Where, a month later, M. Rather, he appears to be a man pursuing pseudoscience.

The results of the most recent inspection of the Burzynski Clinic”. Through all the fuzzy science, Merola sees a savior; you’ll see a dull editorial masquerading as objective reporting. Burzynski may have credibility in the eyes of some, but the movie about him has no credibility, so no one will be receptive to its message. Without the obstruction of FDA red tape, The Burzynski Clinic would gladly treat anyone with most all cancer types if they were allowed to.


Since many of his patients at the time suffered from inoperable brain cancer, most of his Antineoplaston clinical data was in this realm, thus justifying a series of Phase II clinical trials to treat a myriad of different brain cancers.

The chief clinician at Cancer Research UK expressed his concern at the treatment offered, and Andy Lewis of Quackometer and science writer Simon Singhwho had previously been sued by the British Chiropractic Associationsaid that English libel law harms public discussion of science and medicine, and thus public health.

Burzynski or is trying to protect the hegemony of the FDA or the profits of big pharma. I just had to shake my head at that, but after the credits rolled the last three words that came up struck me with dread. Gorski’s full information can be found herealong with information for patients. YoungBurzynski appears to believe that he is a crusading researcher rather than a quack.

Well, that is partially true. The letter requires cessation of noncompliant promotional activities, including use of testimonials and promotional interviews with Burzynski himself. It was painful to sit through.

Burzynski: the Movie

In fact, none of the currently open antineoplaston trials are omvie III trials, which movvie the type of trial that can potentially give a definitive answer about a therapy, because phase III trials are randomized, controlled trials. Unfortunately, four years later inInside Edition followed up these four patients atanislaw found that two of the four had died and a third had recurred, while the fourth had had bladder cancer with a good prognosis.

Out of curiosity, I did a quick search of ClinicalTrials. Although these studies often report remissions, other investigators have not been successful in duplicating these results. January 10, Burzynski Clinic: Then the story leads you to how he has to prove it over and over again to certain doubters but it gets worse.